»

Monday, March 03, 2008

What is the climax of this novel? What happens? How do the events of this novel make you feel?

The climax of this novel is nearly right after Simon wakes up from his faint after his encounter with the Lord of the Flies. All the boys on the island (except for Simon, who was at that time just regaining consciousness) are at Jock's tribal beach place, having a feast, eating the meat from the same sow as the head that Lord of the Flies uses as an "image" for Simon. They start their hunting chant and the climax goes on... Here's page 152~154:


"Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!"

The movement became regular while the chant lost its first superficial excitement and began to beat like a steady pulse. Roger ceased to be a pig and became a hunter, so that the center of the ring yawned emptily. Some of the littluns started a ring on their own; and the complimentary circles went round and round as though repetition would achieve safety of itself. There was the throb and stamp of a single organism.

The dark sky was shattered by a blue-white scar. An instant later the noise was on them like the blow of a gigantic whip. The chant rose a tone in agony.

"Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!"

Now out of the terror rose another desire, thick, urgent, blind.

"Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!"

Again the blue-white scar jagged above them and the sulphurous explosion beat down. The littluns screamed and blundered about, fleeing from the edge of the forest, and one of them broke the ring of biguns in his terror.

"Him! Him!"

The circle became a horseshoe. A thing was crawling out of the forest. It came darkly, uncertainly. The shrill screaming that rose before the beast was like a pain. The beast stumbled into the horseshoe.

"Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!"

The blue-white scar was constant, the noise unendurable. Simon was crying out something about a dead man on a hill.

"Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood! Do him in!"

The sticks fell and the mouth of the new circle crunched and screamed. The beast was on its knees in the center, its arms folded over its face. It was crying out against the abominable noise something about a body on the hill. The beats struggled forward, broke the ring and fell over the steep edge of the rock to the sand by the water. At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws.

Then the clouds opened and let down the rain like a waterfall. The water bounded from the mountain-top, tore leaves and branches from the trees, poured like a cold shower over the struggling heap on the sand. Presently the heap broke up and figures staggered away. Only the beast lay still, a few yards from the sea. Even in the rain they could see how small a beast it was; and already its blood was staining the sand.

***
Somewhere over the darkened curve of the world the sun and moon were pulling, and the film of water on the earth planet was held, bulging slightly on one side while the solid core turned. The great wave of the tide moved farther along the island and the water lifted. Softly, surrounded by a fringe of inquisitive bright creatures, itself a silver shape beneath steadfast constellations, Simon's dead body moved out toward the open sea.


If I were asked this question just last year, my response would have been much different. I would have said that the climax of The Lord of the Flies was when Jack and his tribe had a man-hunt to kill Ralph, because that was the "most exciting part" of the book. But now I know that the climax is "the point of no return". My view of the climax is changed, so I say that this scene is the climax of the whole story. If they had not killed Simon, he would have told them the truth about the Beast, saving them from the chaos that was to come; but they did, in fact, murder him, changing the whole course of the story.

I, personally, didn't like the climax of this story (I liked the book, however), though it was necessary in order to portray the theme that Golding has so effectively shown. I didn't like it because Simon was my favourite character, and also the boys' only hope to be saved from each other. But they killed him. How can he save them if he's dead? He can't! After I read this scene, I stopped reading and sat in a corner, angry at that id**t William Golding for killing poor, little Simon. Simon's not supposed to die! They NEED him! He is the one that's supposed to overcome the Lord of the Flies, and save the island and its society of young boys. BUT HE DIED!!!!!!!! No hope for the island, unless, of course, an adult comes to save them, which, obviously, CANNOT HAPPEN (though it did) because of the lack of a signal fire.

But, in the end, Simon's death was needed for Golding's book to be of value. I realize that, so I'm not going to complain.... as much. But, yeah. This is what I believe to be the climax of The Lord of the Flies.


-Tanner-

8 comments:

Apple Gum said...

Hmmm. You said the climax is Simon's death. Funny, I said it was the death of Piggy.

Well, Simon's death can be seen as a point of no return. I do agree with that. If Simon had been spared, then it would have been possible for most of the boys to return to Ralph and continue living in a civilized manner. However, I am very doubtful of how the truth of the beast could have brought the island to peace. As it is already known, the beast is in the boys. Most of them have already learned the thrill of killing and bloodspill. The beast is no longer a motivation of hunting. Maybe it was too late for the boys to recover their moral anyway. Perhaps, although this is a farfetched theory, the boys would accuse Simon as a liar, and already allied with the beast. They might have killed him and named him traitor. Who knows?

Savagery is unstoppable when nobody can kill it.

t.mid said...

Since I retaliated on your first comment, apple gum, I decided to go all the way.

First of all, Piggy's death?!? How is that the climax AT ALL??? It makes no sense, except that Ralph is on his own. Piggy couldn't protect Ralph from JAck, Roger and the rest of them anyway. All he really did was provide useful information that Ralph helped produce in the first place. I was actually GLAD that Piggy died because he was soooooooo annoying.

Secondly, Simon's death can be seen as a HUGE part of the story. You had pointed out that the boys might not believe Simon that the Beast isn't real. However, do you disagree that earlier in the book, during an assembly, they had believed Simon when he said there maybe WAS a Beast. Even so, they would take extra precaution and go up the mountain, probably during the day because it's less cary, and see for themselves the dead parachuter, and no Beast.

Also, you said that letting them know that there was no Beast couldn't have stopped them anyway. But did you not mention in my "theme" blog that there were some capable of trapping the Beast in, taming it. If they knew of the Beast in them, they could tame it as well, instead of letting it unleash its power on others without the holder realizing what is really happening. So, yes, Simon could have saved them.

Sorry, apple gum.

theoLogy//T-0 said...

Yo Tanner. I think the climax was Piggy's death also. Since you attacked applegum, I will defend applegum because we have the same idea. The reason why Piggys death was the climax because of what he represented. What was Piggy in the group? The typical smart good little boy who follows the rules. He represented what was left of civilization on the island. He represented society's basic laws and order. Wasn't he the one who suggested to keep a fire going in order to be rescued and return to society? And he was one of the main obstacles that stood in the way of Jack's rise to power. Piggy's common sense kept the boys in contemplation when the boys were tempted to turn to savagery. Another thing is the conch. The conch is the symbol of authority and also rules and order. Remember they used the conch to UNITE the boys(by blowing it and setting up a meeting). They decided that whoever holds the conch would be allowed to speak. The conch gave one authority. Because of the conch they were still following the standards set by civilization. However, as Jacks power grows, in the book it starts saying the color of the conch starts getting dull. That means the conch is losing power, which means rules of civilization are losing power. When Piggy is crushed by the rock, the conch he holds shatters into a thousand pieces. That symbolizes ALL ORDER AND RULE GONE from the island. That is why it is the climax Tanner.
ROUND 3 START.

t.mid said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
t.mid said...

First off, I would like to point out that what you were suggesting Piggy represented, was, in my point-of-view, actually what Raplh was a symbol of. He represented the order of the island. Piggy was just there to back him up. Unimportnat compared to the likes of Jack, Ralph, and, of course, Simon.

Also, if what you are proposing near the end of your comment, the climax then, should not be the death of Piggy, but instead should be the shattering of the conch. They are different events, just happening at the same place and the same time. Therefore, I suggest you edit your post and perhaps change your theme to when the conch shatters.

Sorry, man.

Jun Do said...

Umm... you guys are all wrong hahahaha because, Mrs.Lavender!!!
the climax is, the part where the kids meet the navy in the end. this is the part where everything truely changes. with Simon and Piggy's death, there was no change in the main conflict, evil vs. good. eventhough they die, the killing doesn't end.
but in the end where they meet the navy, every kid sobbs because of what they have become in just a few days. this scene just ends the conflict.
well, so, you guys all SUXX!! hahaha

t.mid said...

Wow, JunDo! I never noticed that before... I always saw that as the resolution. Nicely done.

t.mid said...

Even though I don't want to be wrong, I think you beat me JunDo...





Although it COULD work as a possible resolution.